Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 03:12

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Xbox sale round-up June 24, 2025 - DLC - TrueAchievements
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What was the hottest inappropriate sex you ever had?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump administration, for 1st time, returns wrongly deported migrant to US - ABC News
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Microsoft’s Free Upgrade Deadline For 400 Million Windows Users - Forbes
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Do very hot men ever feel attracted to an ugly woman? Why?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
iOS 26's New Battery Life Mode Available Only on These iPhone Models - MacRumors
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
IBM’s New Quantum Roadmap Brings the Bitcoin Threat Closer - Decrypt